| Correlation between MUA and LFP using different windows to define MUA response and LFP response | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 200 ms on / 300 ms off | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0;100 | 50;100 | 100;150 | 100;200 | 100;300 | 100;400 | LFP window | ||||||||||||||
| 0;100 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.03 | ||||||||||||||
| 50;100 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.02 | ||||||||||||||
| 100;150 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.20 | 0.18 | ||||||||||||||
| 100;200 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.15 | ||||||||||||||
| 100;300 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.06 | ||||||||||||||
| 100;400 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.13 | ||||||||||||||
| MUA window | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Average correlation coefficient across all sites with reliable MUA and LFP responses (n = 23 sites). The correlation coefficients correspond to the Pearson correlation coefficient between the MUA and LFP responses for the 77 objects. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| The MUA responses and LFP responses were defined by counting spikes or computing the LFP power in different possible analysis windows; the bolded entry corresponds to the value reported in the main text. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Here stimuli were presented for 200 ms and there was a 300 ms interval between pictures (while the data presented in the main text corresponds to a 100 ms presentation interval with a 100 ms blank in between images) | ||||||||||||||||||||