Correlation between MUA and LFP using
different windows to define MUA response and LFP response |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0;100 |
50;100 |
100;150 |
100;200 |
100;300 |
100;400 |
LFP window |
|
0;100 |
-0.03 |
-0.04 |
-0.03 |
-0.09 |
-0.09 |
-0.08 |
|
|
50;100 |
-0.06 |
-0.06 |
-0.05 |
-0.08 |
-0.07 |
-0.07 |
|
|
100;150 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.24 |
0.21 |
0.19 |
0.16 |
|
|
100;200 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.22 |
0.20 |
0.18 |
0.14 |
|
|
100;300 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.14 |
0.14 |
0.14 |
0.02 |
|
|
100;400 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.14 |
0.15 |
0.11 |
0.08 |
|
|
MUA window |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
correlation coefficient across all sites with reliable MUA and LFP responses
(n=249). The correlation coefficients correspond to the Pearson correlation
coefficient between the MUA and LFP responses for the 77 objects. |
Here
the MUA responses and LFP responses were defined by counting spikes or
computing the LFP power in different possible analysis windows; the bolded
entry corresponds to the value reported in the main text. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|