| Correlation between MUA and LFP using different windows to define MUA response and LFP response | |||||||||||||||||||
| 0;100 | 50;100 | 100;150 | 100;200 | 100;300 | 100;400 | LFP window | |||||||||||||
| 0;100 | -0.03 | -0.04 | -0.03 | -0.09 | -0.09 | -0.08 | |||||||||||||
| 50;100 | -0.06 | -0.06 | -0.05 | -0.08 | -0.07 | -0.07 | |||||||||||||
| 100;150 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.19 | 0.16 | |||||||||||||
| 100;200 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.14 | |||||||||||||
| 100;300 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.02 | |||||||||||||
| 100;400 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.08 | |||||||||||||
| MUA window | |||||||||||||||||||
| Average correlation coefficient across all sites with reliable MUA and LFP responses (n=249). The correlation coefficients correspond to the Pearson correlation coefficient between the MUA and LFP responses for the 77 objects. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Here the MUA responses and LFP responses were defined by counting spikes or computing the LFP power in different possible analysis windows; the bolded entry corresponds to the value reported in the main text. | |||||||||||||||||||