Object selectivity of local field potentials and spikes in the macaque inferior temporal cortex
Supplementary Material
Gabriel Kreiman*, Chou P. Hung*, Alexander Kraskov, Rodrigo Quiroga, Tomaso Poggio, James J. DiCarlo
Center for Biological and Computational Learning
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Computation and Systems Biology Initiative
McGovern Institute for Brain Research
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
*These two authors contributed equally to this work
	Supplementary Figures
		Supplementary Figure 1
		Supplementary Figure 2
		Supplementary Figure 3
		Supplementary Figure 4
		Supplementary Figure 5
		Supplementary Figure 6
		Supplementary Figure 7
		Supplementary Figure 8
	Properties of LFPs
		Power spectrum
		Principal components
	Selectivity of LFPs
		Detailed example
		200 ms presentation example
		Correlation with basic image properties
		Comparison of selectivity with different presentation times
	Selectivity vs time
		LFP responses extend beyond MUA responses
		Lower frequencies in the LFPs show a more sustained response
	Object preference biases across the population
		Population preferences for objects and groups of objects
		Summary of within group selectivity
	Selectivity of spikes and LFPs
		Sparsenss of MUA and LFP responses
		No correlation between sparseness of MUA and LFP at each site
		Criteria for object selectivity
	Spikes versus LFPs
		Spikes versus LFP in different analysis windows
		Spikes versus LFP for 200 ms presentation case
	LFP responses outside visual cortex
		No visual selectivity in the LFPs outside visual cortex
	Time course
		Time course of MUA and LFP responses
	Spatial scale
		Examples of the spiking activity around the LFP recording site
		Spatial scale of LFPs with distance noise simulation
		Correlation between LFP and average spike activity with distance noise simulation
		Correlation between LFP and individual sites as a function of distance
	Other
		Images used in this study
		Coronal MR site map
gk, last updated:10/16/2005
kreiman@mit.edu
HOME